For more information about this case or how our Insurance Litigation team defends insurers and self-insured organisations, please contact us on 01332 226 109 or complete the form below.
Conveyancing
Explore All ConveyancingCriminal Defence
Explore All Criminal DefenceEstate Planning
Explore All Estate PlanningEstate Administraion
Explore All Estate AdministraionDispute Resolution
Explore All Dispute ResolutionFamily & Matrimonial
Explore All Family & MatrimonialMotoring & Driving Offences
Explore All Motoring & Driving OffencesResidential Property
Explore All Residential PropertyResidential Property Disputes
Explore All Residential Property DisputesWills, Trusts & Estate Disputes
Explore All Wills, Trusts & Estate DisputesAgriculture
Explore All AgricultureBusiness Recovery
Explore All Business RecoveryCharities & social enterprises
Explore All Charities & social enterprisesCommercial Disputes
Explore All Commercial DisputesCommercial Law & Contracts
Explore All Commercial Law & ContractsCommercial Property
Explore All Commercial PropertyCorporate & Finance
Explore All Corporate & FinanceData Protection
Explore All Data ProtectionDebt Services
Explore All Debt ServicesEcclesiastical Law
Explore All Ecclesiastical LawEducation Law
Explore All Education LawEmployment Law
Explore All Employment LawFamily Businesses
Explore All Family BusinessesFinance Dispute Resolution
Explore All Finance Dispute ResolutionFinancial & Business Crime
Explore All Financial & Business CrimeInsurance Litigation
Explore All Insurance LitigationIntellectual Property
Explore All Intellectual PropertyLicensing
Explore All LicensingRegulatory & Corporate Defence
Explore All Regulatory & Corporate Defence
Following investigations by one of our insurance litigation experts, the courts ruled a finding of fundamental dishonesty against a director of BR Motors Services Ltd, resulting in our insurer client being awarded £8,000 in costs.
9 June 2021
Case Study
In May 2016, Mr Gorla, a director at BR Motors Services Ltd was involved in a road traffic accident whilst riding a motorcycle on the A40 in London. He then proceeded to pursue a claim for damages and costs worth £20,000.
Following detailed investigations by Flint Bishop and our insurer client, the claim was successfully defended at trial. All heads of loss were dismissed, and Mr Gorla was ordered to repay a without prejudice payment of £1,505 and costs of £8,000.
Although liability for the accident was admitted, our insurer client had issues with aspects of the claim including Mr Gorla’s own company, BR Motors Services Ltd, supplying services to himself including storage of his damaged motorcycle. Mr Gorla also failed to disclose relevant medical conditions and an extensive accident history. These failings were crucial to the finding that Mr Gorla had been fundamentally dishonest in pursuing his claim against our insurer client.
Case Study
The trial proceeded at the County Court at Kingston on Thames in May 2021 before District Judge Armstrong.
Mr Gorla was cross-examined by our barrister for over an hour and a half, in which time Mr Gorla gave a very poor account and the Judge ultimately found him to be wholly unreliable.
In finding Mr Gorla to be fundamentally dishonest, the Judge noted the following issues with his evidence:
The Judge was also highly critical of Mr Gorla’s verbal evidence and counted 33 “I can’t remember” responses after he began keeping notes. Issues that Mr Gorla could not remember included whether he had a bank account at the time of the accident. His disclosure and verbal evidence were so poor with regards to his financial means, that he failed to prove that he was impecunious at the time of the accident.
Our solicitor’s comments on the case:
“Having dedicated a lot of time and effort to this case, I am pleased that this has resulted in such a significant outcome for our client. Whilst this is such a major success for the insurer, ultimately, this is also a win for any bona fide road user, and it is highly reassuring for those who may unexpectedly find themselves defending a dishonest claim following a road traffic incident. Of course, it is also satisfying to be responsible for causing disruption to the business models which surround these types of claims.”
Anthony Carrington, Partner and recently appointed Head of Fraud at Flint Bishop said:
“This result is a fantastic finding against the claimant and those companies involved in the claims process who aim to unjustly profit from trivial road accidents. The inconsistencies in this case were expertly evidenced by the Counter Fraud team at Flint Bishop and the Judge’s findings validate the concerns our client had.
“The claimant has pursued this claim for five years, which just goes to show the lengths that people will go to pursue dishonest claims.”
For more information about this case or how our Insurance Litigation team defends insurers and self-insured organisations, please contact us on 01332 226 109 or complete the form below.
Related Services


A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal case demonstrates some of the issues that may arise in a voluntary redundancy situation.
Read More

Flint Bishop and InterAssista have collaboratively defended a complex cross-border insurance claim.
Read More

Claimant found fundamentally dishonest after pretending to be a passenger in vehicle, as he could not get the accident circumstances or location correct.
Read More

Insurance Litigation Associate, Paul Large, secures another finding of fundamental dishonesty.
Read More

Fundamental dishonesty ruling results in a £10k saving for our insurer client.
Read More

Successful defence for an insurer client against a case involving a claim for a credit hire vehicle following a road traffic accident.
Read More

Paul Bayliss, successfully saved our insurer client in excess of £1.6m in a case brought about by a 17-year-old immigrant who was knocked from…
Read More

Senior associate, Philip Thompson, successfully obtains six-figure compensation award for a Derby resident involved in a catastrophic personal injury accident.
Read More

Another great result achieved by our Insurance Litigation team, saving our insurer client over £40,000 in damages in a recent credit hire matter.
Read More

The case details the work our Insurance Litigation team carried out for one of our insurer clients, who was facing a pleaded schedule of…
Read More

How our Insurance Litigation team used social media activity, medical reports and financial analysis to deliver a tactical Part 36 offer.
Read More

We used a combination of investigations, technical applications and tactics to force two claimants to discontinue their claims shortly before a three-day trial.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top
