For more information about this case or how our Insurance Litigation team defends insurers and self-insured organisations, please contact us on 01332 226 109 or complete the form below.
Conveyancing
Explore All ConveyancingCriminal Defence
Explore All Criminal DefenceEstate Planning
Explore All Estate PlanningEstate Administraion
Explore All Estate AdministraionDispute Resolution
Explore All Dispute ResolutionFamily & Matrimonial
Explore All Family & MatrimonialMotoring & Driving Offences
Explore All Motoring & Driving OffencesResidential Property
Explore All Residential PropertyResidential Property Disputes
Explore All Residential Property DisputesWills, Trusts & Estate Disputes
Explore All Wills, Trusts & Estate DisputesAgriculture
Explore All AgricultureBusiness Recovery
Explore All Business RecoveryCharities & social enterprises
Explore All Charities & social enterprisesCommercial Disputes
Explore All Commercial DisputesCommercial Law & Contracts
Explore All Commercial Law & ContractsCommercial Property
Explore All Commercial PropertyCorporate & Finance
Explore All Corporate & FinanceData Protection
Explore All Data ProtectionDebt Services
Explore All Debt ServicesEcclesiastical Law
Explore All Ecclesiastical LawEducation Law
Explore All Education LawEmployment Law
Explore All Employment LawFamily Businesses
Explore All Family BusinessesFinance Dispute Resolution
Explore All Finance Dispute ResolutionFinancial & Business Crime
Explore All Financial & Business CrimeInsurance Litigation
Explore All Insurance LitigationIntellectual Property
Explore All Intellectual PropertyLicensing
Explore All LicensingRegulatory & Corporate Defence
Explore All Regulatory & Corporate Defence
Successful defence for an insurer client against a case involving a claim for a credit hire vehicle following a road traffic accident.
24 May 2021
Case Study
At the time of instruction, judgment in default had already been entered, and whilst liability for the accident had already been admitted, there was a dispute over whether the hire agreement was enforceable against the defendant’s insurer.
Following detailed analysis, Adam Peers, who led on the case, identified that the hire agreement had not been signed by the claimant until 22 days after the hire period had ended and succeeded in having the judgment set aside.
Case Study
Upon cross-examination, the claimant appeared oblivious as to how much the repairs to his car and the charges for the hire car would be at the time of instructing his solicitor. He also confirmed that he had not signed the hire agreement until after the hire had ended.
Verbal evidence also revealed that the claimant was told by his solicitor that he would not have to pay for the hire car as the defendant’s insurers would cover the costs.
The District Judge commented that “even by the time of the final hearing, the claimant seemed to have a lack of understanding as to how much the claim that was being made was valued at or how it was made up”.
Judgment was reserved and handed down several weeks later in the defendant’s favour, with the District Judge ruling that the hire was not enforceable.
The claimant proceeded to appeal the decision and made several offers to conclude the hire element of the claim before the appeal.
However, all the settlement offers were rejected, and shortly after the appeal hearing was listed the claimant withdrew his appeal, saving our client in the region of £6,000.
For more information about this case or how our Insurance Litigation team defends insurers and self-insured organisations, please contact us on 01332 226 109 or complete the form below.
Related Services


A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal case demonstrates some of the issues that may arise in a voluntary redundancy situation.
Read More

Flint Bishop and InterAssista have collaboratively defended a complex cross-border insurance claim.
Read More

Claimant found fundamentally dishonest after pretending to be a passenger in vehicle, as he could not get the accident circumstances or location correct.
Read More

Insurance Litigation Associate, Paul Large, secures another finding of fundamental dishonesty.
Read More

Fundamental dishonesty ruling results in a £10k saving for our insurer client.
Read More

The courts ruled a finding of fundamental dishonesty against a director of BR Motors Services Ltd resulting in our insurer client being awarded £8,000…
Read More

Paul Bayliss, successfully saved our insurer client in excess of £1.6m in a case brought about by a 17-year-old immigrant who was knocked from…
Read More

Senior associate, Philip Thompson, successfully obtains six-figure compensation award for a Derby resident involved in a catastrophic personal injury accident.
Read More

Another great result achieved by our Insurance Litigation team, saving our insurer client over £40,000 in damages in a recent credit hire matter.
Read More

The case details the work our Insurance Litigation team carried out for one of our insurer clients, who was facing a pleaded schedule of…
Read More

How our Insurance Litigation team used social media activity, medical reports and financial analysis to deliver a tactical Part 36 offer.
Read More

We used a combination of investigations, technical applications and tactics to force two claimants to discontinue their claims shortly before a three-day trial.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top
